The Common Voice Channels Every Public Safety Agency Should Have
Executive Summary
Interoperability failures during emergencies are rarely caused by a lack of radios. They are caused by a lack of shared, pre-planned communications paths.
The National Interoperable Frequencies exist to solve this problem. They provide a standardized set of nationwide, discipline-agnostic voice channels that allow responders from different agencies, jurisdictions, and radio systems to communicate immediately—without patches, gateways, or prior coordination.
These frequencies are not new, experimental, or optional. They are a core element of national emergency communications doctrine and are documented, standardized, and maintained in the National Interoperability Field Operations Guide (NIFOG).
Agencies that fail to program, train on, and plan for these channels routinely rediscover the same lesson during incidents: interoperability cannot be improvised under stress.
What Are National Interoperable Frequencies?
National Interoperable Frequencies are designated radio channels across multiple public safety bands that are reserved specifically for interagency and interjurisdictional communications.
They are intended for:
- Initial on-scene coordination
- Mutual aid operations
- Unified command
- Cross-discipline communications
- Incident expansion beyond local boundaries
These frequencies are:
- Standardized nationwide
- Authorized for use by eligible public safety entities
- Documented in the NIFOG
- Independent of vendor, system, or radio model
The National Interoperability Field Operations Guide (NIFOG)
The National Interoperability Field Operations Guide (NIFOG) is the authoritative reference for national interoperability channels and procedures. It is produced and maintained by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
The NIFOG provides:
- Official channel names and labels
- Frequency assignments
- Band-specific usage guidance
- Operational notes and restrictions
- Interoperability best practices
It is designed to be used:
- In the field
- In dispatch centers
- In emergency operations centers (EOCs)
- During incidents and exercises
Best practice: Every dispatch center, command vehicle, EOC, and COML kit should have immediate access to the NIFOG—either in print or digital form.
National Interoperable Frequency Bands
National interoperability channels exist across multiple spectrum bands, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of radios and environments.
VHF (Very High Frequency)
Common channel examples:
- VCALL10
- VTAC11–14
Best suited for:
- Rural and wide-area operations
- Wildland fire
- Long-range simplex communications
- Areas with limited infrastructure
UHF (Ultra High Frequency)
Common channel examples:
- UCALL40
- UTAC41–43
Best suited for:
- Urban environments
- Indoor operations
- Agencies operating legacy UHF systems
- Dense infrastructure areas
700 MHz
Common channel examples:
- 7CALL50
- 7TAC51–55
Best suited for:
- Modern trunked systems
- Urban and suburban operations
- High-capacity mutual aid events
800 MHz
Common channel examples:
- 8CALL90
- 8TAC91–94
Best suited for:
- Large metropolitan systems
- Regional mutual aid
- Statewide trunked environments

Channel Naming: Why It Matters
National interoperability channels use standardized naming conventions, not agency-specific labels.
For example:
- VCALL = VHF Calling Channel
- VTAC = VHF Tactical Channels
- UCALL / UTAC = UHF Calling / Tactical
- 7CALL / 7TAC = 700 MHz
- 8CALL / 8TAC = 800 MHz
This common naming:
- Eliminates confusion during mutual aid
- Allows responders from different regions to align instantly
- Enables dispatch and command staff to communicate clearly
Renaming these channels locally undermines interoperability and defeats their purpose.
How National Interoperable Frequencies Are Intended to Be Used
Calling vs Tactical Channels
- CALL channels are used to establish contact
- TAC channels are used to conduct operations
Best practice:
- Make initial contact on the appropriate CALL channel
- Assign one or more TAC channels for operations
- Keep CALL channels clear for incoming resources
Simplex vs Repeater Use
Many interoperability channels are designed for simplex (radio-to-radio) use, not repeaters. This allows:
- Rapid deployment
- Infrastructure independence
- Use in austere or damaged environments
Repeater use, where authorized, must follow regional coordination and NIFOG guidance.
Common Planning Failures
Agencies repeatedly encounter problems due to:
- Interoperable channels not programmed into radios
- Channels programmed inconsistently or incorrectly
- Personnel unfamiliar with channel naming
- No SOPs for when or how to use interoperability channels
- Over-reliance on patches and gateways
The existence of the NIFOG does not guarantee interoperability—training and planning do.
Where National Interoperable Frequencies Fit in a Resilience Strategy
National interoperability channels are:
- Infrastructure-light
- Immediately available
- Vendor-agnostic
- Highly reliable for initial coordination
They are not:
- A replacement for trunked systems
- A substitute for satellite or HF systems
- A solution for nationwide or long-haul communications
They are best viewed as the first interoperability layer—the bridge between agencies when incidents escalate beyond routine operations.

Best Practices for Agencies
Every public safety and emergency management organization should:
- Program all applicable national interoperability channels into radios
- Use standard NIFOG naming
- Train personnel on when and how to use CALL vs TAC channels
- Incorporate interoperability channels into exercises
- Maintain access to the latest version of the NIFOG
- Include interoperability procedures in TICPs and EOPs
Conclusion
The National Interoperable Frequencies are one of the simplest, most effective, and most underused interoperability tools available to public safety agencies.
They require no new infrastructure, no vendor integration, and no advanced technology—only planning, discipline, and training.
When agencies share common channels, common names, and common procedures, interoperability happens naturally. When they do not, it fails predictably.
The National Interoperability Field Operations Guide (NIFOG) exists to prevent that failure. Agencies that treat it as optional do so at their own risk.